Machinery Directive is changing...
Directive 2006/42 goes to Regulation 2023/1320 from 20.01.2027 with immediate effect…
Directive - 2006/42 - EN - Machinery Directive - EUR-Lex
1.5.7. Explosion
Machinery must be designed and constructed in such a way as to avoid any risk of explosion posed by the machinery itself or by gases, liquids, dust, vapours or other substances produced or used by the machinery.
Machinery must comply, as far as the risk of explosion due to its use in a potentially explosive atmosphere is concerned, with the provisions of the specific Community Directives.
Regulation - 2023/1230 - EN - EUR-Lex
1.5.7. Explosion
Machinery or related products shall be designed and constructed in such a way as to avoid any risk of explosion presented by the machinery or related product itself or by gases, liquids, dust, vapours or other substances produced or used by the machinery or related product.
Machinery or related products shall comply, as far as the risk of explosion due to its use in a potentially explosive atmosphere is concerned, with the provisions of the specific Union harmonisation legislation.
So the Assessment
|
Aspect |
2006/42/EC – Machinery Directive |
(EU) 2023/1230 – Machinery Regulation |
Change |
|
Legal form |
Directive |
Regulation |
Major (direct applicability) |
|
Annex |
Annex I – Essential Health and Safety Requirements (EHSR) |
Annex III – Essential Health and Safety Requirements |
Renumbered annex |
|
Explosion clause |
1.5.7 Explosion |
1.5.7 Explosion |
Numbering remained |
|
Section title |
Explosion |
Explosion |
No change |
Key point:
The explosion requirement keeps the same internal numbering (1.5.7), deliberately preserving continuity for manufacturers, notified bodies, and compliance engineers.
Textual comparison – clause by clause
First sentence (risk of explosion)
|
2006/42/EC |
(EU) 2023/1230 |
Assessment |
|
"Machinery must be designed and constructed…" |
"Machinery or related products shall be designed and constructed…" |
Scope expanded |
|
"…risk of explosion posed by the machinery itself…" |
"…risk of explosion presented by the machinery or related product itself…" |
Editorial + scope |
|
"…or by gases, liquids, dust, vapours or other substances produced or used by the machinery." |
Same wording, extended to "related product" |
No technical change |
Engineering meaning
Second sentence (use in potentially explosive atmosphere)
|
2006/42/EC |
(EU) 2023/1230 |
Assessment |
|
"specific Community Directives" |
"specific Union harmonisation legislation" |
Legal modernisation |
|
"due to its use in a potentially explosive atmosphere" |
Same wording |
No change |
Engineering meaning

Terminology evolution – why it matters
Community → Union harmonisation legislation
|
Old term |
New term |
Practical consequence |
|
Community Directives |
Union harmonisation legislation |
Covers Regulations + Directives |
|
ATEX Directive 94/9/EC |
ATEX Directive 2014/34/EU |
Explicitly included |
|
Future Ex regulations |
Automatically included |
Future-proofing |
The Regulation anticipates future ATEX-like legislation without needing amendment.
Scope expansion: "machinery OR related products"
This is one of the most important changes. What are "related products"?
Explosion protection impact
Compliance logic – unchanged but reinforced
Few point that remains exactly the same: Machinery must not create an explosion risk itself. If used in a potentially explosive atmosphere, ATEX Directive applies with immediate effect. Machinery Regulation does NOT grant ATEX compliance.
BUT reinforced for legal clarity, broader scope, direct enforceability (no national transposition).
Practical Ex-engineering interpretation
|
Topic |
2006/42/EC |
(EU) 2023/1230 |
|
Internal explosion risk |
Mandatory |
Mandatory |
|
External Ex atmosphere |
ATEX required |
ATEX required |
|
Dust ignition |
Explicit |
Explicit |
|
Static electricity |
Implicit |
Implicit |
|
Hybrid machinery |
Grey area |
Clearly included |
|
Legal enforceability |
National transposition |
Directly applicable EU-wide |
One-sentence executive conclusion
The explosion protection requirement (1.5.7) remains technically unchanged, but the Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 strengthens it legally by expanding scope, modernising references, and ensuring direct, uniform enforcement—while fully preserving the ATEX interface.
Manufacturer vs End-User Responsibility Matrix
Explosion Protection (Machinery Context)
Design & Engineering Phase
|
Topic |
Manufacturer |
End-User |
|
Explosion risk generated by machinery itself |
Full responsibility |
None |
|
Identification of ignition sources (hot surfaces, sparks, friction, static, reactions) |
Mandatory |
None |
|
Dust, gas, vapour generation by machinery |
Must be assessed and controlled |
None |
|
Internal explosion prevention measures |
Mandatory |
None |
|
Selection of suitable materials to avoid ignition |
Mandatory |
None |
|
Machinery risk assessment (Machinery Reg.) |
Mandatory |
None |
|
Definition of limits of use |
Mandatory |
None |
Key rule: The manufacturer is responsible for all explosion risks originating from the machinery itself, regardless of where it is installed.
Use in Potentially Explosive Atmospheres
|
Topic |
Manufacturer |
End-User |
|
Declaring whether machinery is intended for Ex use |
Mandatory |
None |
|
ATEX equipment compliance (if intended for Ex zones) |
Mandatory |
None |
|
ATEX marking (II 2G, II 3D, etc.) |
Mandatory |
None |
|
Equipment Protection Level (EPL) definition |
Mandatory |
None |
|
Installation environment definition (zones) |
None |
Mandatory |
|
Zone classification (0/1/2 – 20/21/22) |
None |
Mandatory |
|
Matching machinery category to zone |
Advisory only |
Mandatory |
Key rule: ATEX applies only when machinery is intended for Ex atmospheres, but zone definition is always the end-user's duty.
Documentation & Information
|
Topic |
Manufacturer |
End-User |
|
Explosion-related design assumptions |
Must be documented |
None |
|
Residual explosion risks |
Must be declared |
Must consider |
|
Instructions for safe installation |
Mandatory |
Must follow |
|
Instructions for operation & maintenance |
Mandatory |
Must follow |
|
Limits of use (non-Ex / Ex restrictions) |
Mandatory |
Must respect |
|
Declaration of Conformity |
Mandatory |
None |
|
Explosion Protection Document (EPD) |
None |
Mandatory |
Installation & Commissioning
|
Topic |
Manufacturer |
End-User |
|
Correct installation concept |
Must define |
None |
|
Installation according to Ex rules |
Advisory |
Mandatory |
|
Grounding / bonding implementation |
Advisory |
Mandatory |
|
Verification before first use |
None |
Mandatory |
|
Compliance with ATEX 1999/92/EC |
None |
Mandatory |
Important: Even ATEX-certified machinery can become non-compliant if installed incorrectly.
Operation, Maintenance & Modifications
|
Topic |
Manufacturer |
End-User |
|
Safe operation concept |
Must define |
Must implement |
|
Maintenance intervals |
Must specify |
Must perform |
|
Spare parts specification |
Must define |
None |
|
Use of non-original parts |
No responsibility |
Full responsibility |
|
Modifications / upgrades |
No responsibility |
Full responsibility |
|
Re-assessment after modification |
None |
Mandatory |
|
Maintaining ATEX integrity |
None |
Mandatory |
Golden rule:
The moment the end-user modifies the machinery, they assume manufacturer-level responsibility for explosion risks.
Legal Liability Summary
|
Scenario |
Responsible Party |
|
Explosion caused by machinery design flaw |
Manufacturer |
|
Explosion caused by incorrect zone classification |
End-User |
|
Explosion due to misuse outside defined limits |
End-User |
|
Explosion due to missing ATEX certification |
Manufacturer |
|
Explosion after unauthorized modification |
End-User |
|
Explosion due to missing EPD |
End-User |
Executive One-Line Rule
The manufacturer controls explosion risks created by the machine; the end-user controls explosion risks created by the environment and its operation.
Keep up the good work!
Note: Your comment will only appear on the site after review. Your email address will not be visible, only your name and comment.